« May 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31


Kick Assiest Blog
Thursday, 4 May 2006
Pat Kennedy Car Crash Cover-up?
Mood:  d'oh
Now Playing: LIBTARD ''CULTURE OF CORRUPTION'' ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

KENNEDY CAR CRASH COVER-UP?

Police labor union officials asked acting Chief Christopher McGaffin this afternoon to allow a Capitol Police officer to complete his investigation into an early-morning car crash involving Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), son of Sen. Ted Kennedy.

ROLL CALL reports: According to a letter sent by Officer Greg Baird, acting chairman of the USCP FOP, the wreck took place at approximately 2:45 a.m. Thursday when Kennedy's car, operating with its running lights turned off, narrowly missed colliding with a Capitol Police cruiser and smashed into a security barricade at First and C streets Southeast.

"The driver exited the vehicle and he was observed to be staggering," Baird's letter states. Officers approached the driver, who "declared to them he was a Congressman and was late to a vote. The House had adjourned nearly three hours before this incident. It was Congressman Patrick J. Kennedy from Rhode Island."

Baird wrote that Capitol Police Patrol Division units, who are trained in driving under the influence cases, were not allowed to perform basic field sobriety tests on the Congressman. Instead, two sergeants, who also responded to the accident, proceeded to confer with the Capitol Police watch commander on duty and then "ordered all of the Patrol Division Units to leave the scene and that they were taking over."

A source tells the DRUDGE REPORT: "It was apparent that the driver was intoxicated (stumbling) and claimed he was in a hurry to make a vote.

"When it became apparent who it was, instead of processing a normal DWI, the watch commander had the Patrol units clear the scene. The commander allowed other building officials drive Kennedy home."

This morning's incident comes just over two weeks after Kennedy was involved in a car accident in Rhode Island.

"I was involved in a traffic accident last night at First and C Street SE near the U.S. Capitol," Kennedy said in a written statement released by his office. "I consumed no alcohol prior to the incident. I will fully cooperate with the Capitol Police in whatever investigation they choose to undertake."

Drudge Report Exclusive ** Kennedy Car Crash Cover-up?

Later, however, he issued a longer statement saying the attending physician for Congress had prescribed Phenergan on Tuesday to treat Kennedy's gastroenteritis, an inflammation of the stomach and intestines.

Kennedy said he returned to his Capitol Hill home on Wednesday evening after a final series of votes in Congress and took "prescribed" amounts of Phenergan and Ambien, another prescribed drug that he occasionally takes to fall asleep.

"Some time around 2:45 a.m., I drove the few blocks to the Capitol Complex believing I needed to vote," his second statement said. "Apparently, I was disoriented from the medication."

Kennedy appeared to be intoxicated when he crashed his Ford Mustang into a barrier on Capitol Hill early Thursday morning, said Louis P. Cannon, president of the Washington chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police.

USA Today ~ Associated Press ** Rep. Patrick Kennedy blames car crash on medication
Kennedy's origional written statement released by his office...
Breitbart.com ~ Associated Press - Andrew Miga ** Kennedy Confirms Car Crash Near Capitol

Related: Pat Kennedy's April 15th car crash...
This Blog *** Pat Kennedy fails Rhode test, Boy blunder didn't have right - or write - of way

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 11:26 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 4 May 2006 11:31 PM EDT
Wednesday, 3 May 2006
Libtard Richard Dreyfuss campaigns against ''shaped news''
Mood:  spacey
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Oscar-winner Dreyfuss campaigns against "shaped news"

LONDON - Richard Dreyfuss has challenged the establishment for decades and now the maverick actor and activist is taking on the mainstream media.

The Oscar-winning star says an obsession with delivering instantaneous news and images provides too little context for audiences to reflect and understand what is happening in the world.

"There is no room to pause, no room to think," Dreyfuss, who starred in films ranging from "Jaws" to "Mr Holland's Opus" told Reuters in a recent telephone interview.

"We don't build into our system of thoughts the need to explain, the media doesn't build that into its transmission of knowledge and information."

That creates what Dreyfuss calls "shaped news" -- a version of events according to how the mainstream media want audiences to see what happened, and a violation of journalism's core value of objectivity.

Citizen journalism is playing a vital part in broadening news coverage, as well as scrutinizing professional journalism, Dreyfuss said.

"Information from more than one source is good. I'm totally in favor of it, even if people send propaganda. In the aggregate you can find more truth than in one opinion."

But despite an explosion in blogs, people's views of the news is still shaped by what powerful media corporations print, broadcast and put on their Web sites, Dreyfuss, 58, said.

"Do the mainstream media ever tell their readers 'Don't believe everything we tell you?' No, they don't."

Dreyfuss said media coverage of the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center in New York was a pertinent example of how a non-stop supply of images and spot news shaped people's views.

"The falling Twin Towers -- pictures that produced anger, a lot of anger that were sent instantly around the world, they created a need to react."

"People in Kansas could see the Twin Towers fall at exactly the same instant as in Nigeria and Cairo. Such an instantaneous knowledge of a situation leads to an instantaneous reaction which creates demand for an instantaneous, reflexive response.

"The question is how do you get people to find out more, how do you get people to read not just what they are told to read."

The power of language is also an important factor in shaping the news.

"The 'war on terror' -- objection to using this term is dead. It's become part of our vocabulary, but what does it really mean? You should know more specifically what you are fighting."

Dreyfuss is eager to point out that he is not anti-technology: "I'm not in love with technology and speed but I don't want to sound like a luddite.

"We've got to be aware of the power of technology and the speed at which it allows us to transmit information.

"You have to encourage prose, analysis and detail -- otherwise people will go to war in Iraq and Afghanistan without really knowing why."

Dreyfuss, who won an Oscar for his performance in "The Goodbye Girl," has pursued his passion for political and social activism since his college days.

An active opponent of the Vietnam War, he has also worked to promote solutions to the Mideast conflict, campaigned for education and, most recently, has lent his support to a campaign for the impeachment of President Bush.

He is studying civics and democracy as a senior associate member at St Antony's College at the University of Oxford.

"Civics is no longer taught in the U.S, a sign of a neurosis that is inexplicable," he said. "Not to teach civics is suicide.

"Reason, logic, civility, dissent and debate -- five ancient words that should be taught again and better, at elementary level, so that people know the difference between news and shaped news," Dreyfuss said.

CNN / Netscape News ~ Reuters - Astrid Zweynert ** Oscar-winner Dreyfuss campaigns against "shaped news"

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 3:52 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 3:57 PM EDT
Coward Deanpeace: Karl Rove More Guilty than Bin Laden
Mood:  spacey
Topic: Lib Loser Stories


Howard Dean: Karl Rove Guiltier than Osama Bin Laden

Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean is telling reporters that there's no doubt top White House aide Karl Rove is guilty in the Valerie Plame Leakgate case.

Three years ago, however, Dean urged caution when it came to assessing the guilt of Osama bin Laden, whose role in the Sept. 11 attacks, he said, should not be prejudged.

"There's no question that Rove was the one that leaked the information about the CIA agent's name," Dean told MSNBC's Nora O'Donnell on Friday.

But when it came to the Al Qaida terror chief, Dean insisted that bin Laden was innocent until proven guilty.

"I still have this old-fashioned notion that even with people like Osama, who is very likely to be found guilty, we should do our best not to, in positions of executive power, not to prejudge jury trials," he told the Concord Monitor in Dec. 2003.

The guiltier-than-bin Laden Rove, said Dean, is "a big liability for the administration," since he "continually reminds the American people that the president wasn't truthful about firing leakers, in addition to not being truthful about a number of other things."

He pledged that if Democrats win back Congress in November, they'll launch a new round of investigations into supposed White House corruption.

"No doubt there will be investigations because there's been so much corruption in the White House and the vice president's office, even the Republican Senate president is under investigation for insider trading."

Asked whether Democrats would try to impeach President Bush, Dean told O'Donnell: "It's possible."

News Max.com ~ Carl Limbacher ** Howard Dean: Karl Rove Guiltier than Osama Bin Laden

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 3:28 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 3:35 PM EDT
Libtard Tim Robbins blasts US media ignorance of 'high crimes' in Iraq
Mood:  silly
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Must be a lul in his attention meter. Didnt he say this like 3 years ago?

Hollywood star Robbins blasts US media ignorance of 'high crimes' in Iraq

Acclaimed American actor/director Tim Robbins blasted the US government's policy on terrorism -- and the US media's failure to examine it critically -- at a news conference in Athens promoting his stage version of George Orwell's "1984".

"We have right now a media that is willfully ignoring the high crimes and misdemeanours of the president of the United States," the star of Hollywood hits including "Mystic River" and "The Player" told reporters.

"Clinton lied about a blowjob, and got impeached by the media and Congress," Robbins said.

"(Bush) got us into (the Iraq) war based on lies that he knew were lies. ... His war has recruited more Al-Qaeda members than Osama bin Laden could ever have dreamed for ... yet no one in the media is calling for impeachment," he said.

Robbins pointed out similarities between current US policies on terrorism and the authoritarian society described by Orwell.

"Unfortunately, the book and the play is more relevant now than it ever has been," he said. "(It) talks about continuous warfare as a means to control the Western economy, and as a way to control rebel elements within society through the use of fear, constant fear."

"In my country we seem to be sanctioning renditioning of innocent people without trial ... put them in jail without telling anyone ... and torture them out of suspicion of what we think they might do," Robbins said.

"This is exactly what Orwell was talking about when he spoke of thought crimes," he added.

Orwell's bleak classic, published in 1949, is based on a futuristic society in which the government, known as "Big Brother", spies on its citizens' every move and tortures them on suspicion of dissent.

The play, which Robbins produces and directs, opened in Athens for a five-day run on Tuesday.

He is hoping to also direct a film version of the play in the fall.

Breitbart.com ~ Agence France-Presse ** Hollywood star Robbins blasts US media ignorance of 'high crimes' in Iraq

Clinton was impeached by the media? In what dimension did that happen???

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 3:15 PM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 3:20 PM EDT
Libtard Eliot Spitzer Blasts Scalia's 'Constructionist' View
Mood:  spacey
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Spitzer Blasts Scalia's 'Constructionist' View

Democratic candidate for governor Eliot Spitzer on Monday criticized the strict "constructionist" view of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who views the Constitution as unalterable by cultural or social trends.

"As a citizen, and as the state's lawyer, I believe in an evolving Constitution," said Spitzer, the state attorney general, at the annual Law Day ceremony at the New York Court of Appeals. "A flexible Constitution leaves room for us to consider not merely how the world once was, but how it ought to be."

The next governor will have at least two spots to fill on the seven-member court with Judge Albert Rosenblatt's term ending on Dec. 31 and Chief Judge Judith Kaye's ending next March.

Spitzer said that under the strict "constructionist" reading of the Constitution favored by Scalia and others, the "separate but equal" policy of segregation would still be allowed, there would never have been a Roe v. Wade decision protecting abortion rights and children could still be executed for felonies.

Scalia (right) is considered one of the most conservative members of the court.

Spitzer, leading in the polls to be New York's next governor, declined to discuss what type of judge he would nominate to the state's highest court, but said he would favor someone whose Constitutional analysis jibes with his own.

Republican Gov. George Pataki will have the chance to fill one more spot on the court with Judge George Bundy Smith's term ending in September. Smith has applied to be reappointed to the bench.

Republican candidate John Faso criticized Spitzer for his comments.

"I think that it's very unfortunate that an attorney general would attack by name a sitting justice of the U.S. Supreme Court," he said. "It's one thing to question a judicial philosophy, but I think this shows a certain lack of respect for the court."

Faso said Spitzer didn't accurately characterize the judge's views.

Andrea Tantaros, spokeswoman for Republican candidate Bill Weld, called Spitzer's comments "hairsplitting obscure theories of jurisprudence." She said Weld, a former federal prosecutor, is instead "focused on creating jobs, keeping New Yorkers safe, and changing the culture in Albany."

News Max.com ~ Associated Press ** Spitzer Blasts Scalia's 'Constructionist' View

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 2:48 PM EDT
Harvard loves a thug, Alumni instructed to bow to Kim Il Sung
Mood:  silly
Now Playing: LIBTARD EDUCATION ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Totalitarian tourism is nothing new. Seventy years ago, American tourists used to admire the cleanliness and orderliness of Nazi Germany. How handsome those Hitlerjugend boys and the German Girls' Leaguers looked in their clean uniforms. Look at those wonderful Autobahns. And Mussolini made the trains run on time.

Those of the opposite political stripe would visit the USSR. Things weren't so good there. Moscow University invited hundreds of American college students to study for a year there, then abruptly and without explanation cancelled classes when they arrived. So the American students spent their time hearing the lies of their Intourist handlers. Lies like, they might be surprised to see workers' children playing in the parks since in the United States only rich people's children get to do that. Lies like, they might be surprised to see such large collective farms since American farms are all small and full of stony fields.

The American students, who had sung "The Internationale" as their ship left the dock, didn't embarrass their guides with facts. It's unlikely that their grandchildren will act any different in North Korea.

The apex of totalitarian tourism wasn't Lincoln Steffens, who after his visit to the Worker's Paradise remarked, "I have seen the future and it works." Steffens was outdone by the Vice-President of the United States, Henry Wallace. He visited Kolyma in 1944 and didn't realize he was looking at the most notorious Gulag prison camp. He thought the 40,000 inhabitants of Magadan were pioneers instead of slave laborers. He said of the Communist regime, "There is nothing irreconcilable in our aims and purposes. Those who so proclaim are wittingly or unwittingly looking for war--and that, in my opinion, is criminal."

Had not FDR dumped Wallace in favor of Truman in the next election, this gullible totalitarian-tourist would have become President of the United States.

In the past Joe Kennedy and George Bernard Shaw both praised Hitler and Stalin....More Useful Idiots of the left...

HARVARD LOVES A THUG

Harvard University has a bizarre idea of how to advance the education of its grads: Instruct them to bow down to North Ko rea's paranoid dictators and show proper "respect" for the Axis of Evil.

It's the ultimate in radical Stalinist chic - the Harvard Alumni Association's $636-a-night totalitarian luxury tour of a rogue nation where thousands are deliberately starved to death.

"Demonstrations of respect for the country's late leader, Kim Il Sung, and for the current leader, Kim Jong Il, are important," instructs the Harvard Alumni Association's tour memo.

"You will be expected to bow as a gesture of respect at the statue of Kim Il Sung and at his mausoleum."

Harvard even tries to pretend that bowing down to thugs is perfectly normal - explaining that it's because "North Korea, like every country, has its own unique protocols."

Well, yes, that certainly is a charming use of euphemism to cover up an ugly and unique reality - since North Korea is not "like every country."

North Korea's "protocols" feature massive human-rights abuses, deliberate famine, concentration camps, religious persecution, gas chambers, likely genocide and trafficking in women and children.

Plus sending body snatchers to Japan and South Korea to kidnap children and force them to train North Korean spies.

Satie Yokota, the mother of a Japanese girl kidnapped in 1977 at age 13 while clutching her racket on the way home from school badminton practice, calls North Korea "enemies of humanity." Now 70, she fears she'll die before she ever sees her daughter again.

Then there's the Stalinist personality cult - when the Harvard alums bow down, they'll be joining the national worship that requires every North Korean to wear a Kim Il Sung lapel pin or else.

Not surprisingly, the Harvard alums are also instructed to carefully censor their reading matter because "certain types of literature may not be allowed into North Korea."

The reason the rooms are so expensive is that North Korea controls all costs - and is in desperate need of foreign currency. The visits effectively subsidize Kim Jong Il's rule.

The ostensible excuse for granting visas to Americans this summer is so they can see the spectacle known as the Arirang games or the Grand Mass Gymnastic and Artistic Performance.

Walter Keats, Harvard '67, whose travel agency is helping to set up the trip, gushed to USA Today that the spectacle is like seeing "Aida" at the Great Pyramids or "Turandot" in Beijing's Forbidden City.

Never mind that the athletes are really slave labor performing under extreme duress - imagine the punishment that awaits anyone who spoils the spectacle by tripping.

At High Country Passage, a tourist agency handling Harvard bookings, agent Tamara Starkes said the alums will stay in "very nice four-star hotels that are tourist-only. The locals cannot go."

High Country's chief, Chris Springer, says he's also packaging North Korea tours for Columbia, Princeton, Duke, the National Trust, MIT, and the University of California-Berkeley.

Asked if he's uncomfortable about totalitarian tourism, Springer says "it's a good question" but argues that outside visits could help open up North Korea. Maybe. But something is very wrong when Harvard - whose motto is "veritas," Latin for "truth" - feels comfortable instructing its alums to bow down to evil thugs.

Deborah Orin, The Post's Washington bureau chief, is a Harvard grad who won't be taking this tour.
NY Post ~ Deborah Orin ** Harvard loves a thug
Related: ---- Front Page Magazine.com ~ Townhall.com -
Jeff Jacoby ** Totalitarian Chic

This Blog *** Journalist Shows Off Commie Soviet Symbol (Again)
Townhall.com ~ Dennis Prager ** How to identify American totalitarians

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 2:04 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 4 May 2006 1:33 AM EDT
Monday, 1 May 2006
Alec's Brother Daniel Baldwin Arrested on Cocaine Charge
Mood:  d'oh
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Wow, this is just like Rush Limbaugh's situtation. NOT!
I bet the lefties won't say Baldwin is an addict, or that Baldwin has a "weak character."

Alec Baldwin's Brother Daniel Baldwin Arrested on Cocaine Charge

It appears that two of the Baldwin brothers are having a bad week. Alec Baldwin's brother Daniel Baldwin has reportedly been arrested in Los Angeles on charges of possession of cocaine reports TMZ.

The story, broken by TMZ reports that Daniel, 45 brother to Alec, Stephen and Billy, was arrested on April 22nd, after cops received a call that a woman had been threatened at the Ocean Park Motel in Santa Monica, California.

The web site reports that it has been told that the police responded to a motel room where Baldwin and man named Buddy Winston were front and center.

Cops said they found cocaine and arrested both men. Baldwin's bail was set a $10,000.

It may not be so bad though as sources tell TMZ that the Los Angeles County District Attorney has declined to prosecute the case and referred it to the Santa Monica City Attorney.

That means, at worst, Baldwin could be prosecuted for misdemeanor drug possession.

No comment yet from any PR folks for the actor.

More at: TMZ.com ** Baldwin Brother Busted
Daniel Baldwin's Internet Movie Database profile is here.
Alec's earlier troubles this week...
Washington Post ~ Associated Press - Michael Kuchwara ** Actress Exits Play Over Alec Baldwin

The National Ledger ~ Lynda Johnson ** Alec Baldwin's Brother Daniel Baldwin Arrested on Cocaine Charge

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 12:43 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 1 May 2006 1:05 AM EDT
Sunday, 30 April 2006
FLASHBACK: Prosecutor Bluffed; 'Limbaugh Committed at Least 10 Felonies'
Mood:  chatty
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

FLASHBACK: PROSECUTOR BLUFFED 'LIMBAUGH COMMITTED AT LEAST 10 FELONIES'

Palm Beach County prosecutors rejected an overture in 2004 from Rush Limbaugh's attorneys that would have allowed the nation's top talkshow host to enter drug rehabilitation, rather than face criminal charges for prescription drug abuse.

Prosecutors, at the time, claimed they had evidence that Limbaugh committed at least 10 felonies!

It now appears James Martz, the prosecutor who headed the investigation into Limbaugh's prescription drug use, was bluffing when he said that medical records "indicate evidence that would support in excess of 10 felony counts for violations."

Prosecutors said Limbaugh, in any deal, would have to plead guilty to doctor shopping, a third-degree felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

[Prosecutors also suggested at the time that Limbaugh may have been involved in illegal money laundering.]

In an anticlimactic Florida finish, Limbaugh today will respond that he is "not guilty" of a single charge of fraud for concealing information to obtain a prescription -- and in 18 months the charge will be dropped and the record expunged.

The case of the vanishing evidence... Drudge Report Exclusive ** Flashback: Prosecutor Bluffed 'Limbaugh Committed at Least 10 Felonies'

Related: Rush Limbaugh reaches settlement in Florida drug case

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 10:46 PM EDT
Updated: Sunday, 30 April 2006 10:52 PM EDT
Saturday, 29 April 2006
Illegals & Demented-crats In Your Face Again
Mood:  loud
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Monday is May Day, the great communist holiday, and the illegal alien movement says it's going to stick it to you in force...

Illegals & Democrats In Your Face Again

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Let's get to some news out there folks, because there's a lot of it. We've got a big day coming up on Monday: (story) "Pro-immigration activists say a national boycott and marches planned for May 1 will flood America's streets with millions of Latinos to demand amnesty for illegal immigrants and shake the ground under Congress as it debates reform. Such a massive turnout could make for the largest protests since the civil rights era of the 1960s, though not all Latinos were comfortable with such militancy, fearing a backlash in Middle America. 'There will be 2 to 3 million people hitting the streets in Los Angeles alone. We're going to close down Los Angeles, Chicago, New York, Tucson, Phoenix, Fresno,' said Jorge Rodriguez, a union official who helped organize earlier rallies credited with rattling Congress as it weighs the issue."


And from California. (story) "State senators on Thursday endorsed Monday's boycott of schools, jobs and stores by illegal immigrants and their allies as supporters equated the protest with great social movements in American history. By a 24-13 vote that split along party lines, the Senate approved a resolution that calls the one-day protest the Great American Boycott 2006 and describes it as an attempt to educate Americans 'about the tremendous contribution immigrants make on a daily basis to our society and economy.'" Nobody disputes that. They're going to try to educate us racist xenophobes about what it is that makes the country work. Nobody is upset with immigrants.

But this is just stunning. In fact, I was talking with somebody the other day playing golf. There's a movie out there. I forget the title of it, but the movie is about what would happen if all of the illegal immigrants in California weren't there. The state would fall apart, the state would cease to function, the state would go to hell in a handbasket. I said, "Who produced this? I never heard of this." I wish I could remember the name of it. There's a push here, folks. When you get a state senate, the California State Senate, supporting this with an official resolution, a boycott of schools. This is the greatest illustration you could find of just how frightened politicians are of this in an election year, and it's a party line split here. It tells you the Democrats, what are they looking at here, they're looking at votes, pure and simple.

This is going to be an amazing year, because we've got some of the most ludicrous, ridiculous, embarrassing, pandering behavior by politicians I have ever seen on a host of issues, from this gasoline business, to illegal immigration, to the ports deal, it's not stopping. It's only going to get worse. It's a constant barrage, daytime insult to our intelligence, and it's all made to order for the Drive-By Media. There have been a bunch of drive-bys happening here at the same time. Oh, and let's not forget this. This got people roiled today. (story) "British music producer Adam Kidron says that when he came up with the idea of a Spanish-language version of the U.S. national anthem, he saw it as an ode to the millions of immigrants seeking a better life.

"But in the week since Kidron announced the song - which features artists such as Wyclef Jean, hip-hop star Pitbull and Puerto Rican singers Carlos Ponce and Olga Tanon - it has been the target of a fierce backlash." Oh Really? "Some Internet bloggers and others are infuriated by the thought of 'The Star-Spangled Banner' sung in a language other than English. 'Would the French accept people singing the La Marseillaise in English as a sign of French patriotism? Of course not,' said Mark Krikorian, head of the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies."

Now, we hear all this talk that they're a little bit worried about a backlash. They can't possibly be worried about a backlash. All this talk that some people are worried? There might be a few them worried about a backlash, but this is in-your-face just like the first one was. "We demand to be exempt from your laws or else, and we have the power behind us because the Democrats are with us."

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

In case you haven't heard this, "Mexican lawmakers issued a declaration of support for immigrant protests planned in the United States on Monday and said they will send a delegation to Los Angeles to show their solidarity." We need to revive the Limbaugh Laws. You try this down in Mexico, you are in jail. You would not get past your first flier posted on a phone pole announcing your protest without some authority coming to round you up and throw you in some stinking rotten jail. "The declaration, issued late Thursday by all the political parties in the lower house of Congress, contrasts with the position of Mexico’s Foreign Department, which has said it will discipline any consular officials who take part in the protests. The delegation of lawmakers will meet with Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. 'The only thing we are looking for is to end this dehumanizing situation and get the recognition of the migrant labor force,' Federal Deputy Maria Garcia said. 'People who go looking for work should not be treated like criminals with the risk of being tried in federal courts.'"

Well, interesting for you to say that. Try it in Mexico and see what happens. You do just that, and you are in jail. Now for some of politics of this. Here are some things that you will not see in the Drive-By Media. There's a Rasmussen poll, and they went out and they constructed a poll based on a third-party candidacy, driven into a third-party candidacy by the immigration issue. "A third-party candidate who promised to build a barrier along the Mexican border and make enforcement of immigration his top priority beats the generic Republican nominee by nine points, 30-21. Runs practically even with the generic Democrat nominee who gets 31%. The Border-centric third party candidacy actually takes more votes from the Democrat side than the Republican side but it draws heavily from both parties and is heavily from moderates as from conservatives."

So Rasmussen went out there and just did a generic poll and made up a third party candidate who had immigration border security and a fence as his number one priority, and that candidate beats the generic Republican nominee by nine points and scores practically even with the Democrat in the generic poll. So we'll see if the word of this Rasmussen poll spreads to both political parties and see, if it does, how it affects them, since they're all so poll-driven, particularly in an election year. Darren, George Mason University in Washington, welcome to the program. Nice to have you with us.

CALLER: Hi, Rush, thanks a lot for taking my call.

RUSH: You bet.

CALLER: I just wanted to bring up today, I want to ask you and get your opinion on -- This week the Senate and the House debated the bill the president sent for the emergency supplemental to fund Iraq and Hurricane Katrina relief, and the Senate beefed up that bill by almost $15 billion, of which there was 15 million in there for pork, for seafood marketing. I mean, I really think the Republican Party has really abandoned its principles here in spending. And do you think, is the base of the Republican Party, are they really upset over this out-of-control spending? I read it in the paper, but I don't think I believe it.

RUSH: You don't believe the Republican base is that upset over the spending?

CALLER: Correct.

RUSH: Well, it's hard to really know. I know that it's not just that. The Republican base is upset about a lot of things, and if you combine them, you have some real concern. They're upset about immigration. They are upset over the spending, of course. They're upset over a couple of other things. It's still early. And I think predicting vote turnout based on what's happening now is risky because there are going to be profound things that happen between now and November, things that will make what's happening today be forgotten. It's an election year, and whatever politicians figure out are their big problems, they'll try to fix it, somehow, some way, like they're trying to with gasoline prices, like they're trying to with illegal immigration. They're trying to just come up with words and phrases that satisfy everybody but don't actually accomplish anything. You talk about that bill. There's an aspect of that bill that upset me more than the $15 billion because we knew that's going to happen, these guys are who they are.

Republicans in the Senate decided from the Iraq funding bill, to take 1.9 billion of it and send it to Hurricane Katrina relief. It set up an either/or situation. I'm scratching my head, folks, we can't do both? We can't do both at the same time? We're funding the war in Iraq, the war on terror. We gotta take from that in order to -- now why do that? I'll tell you why do that, because this is a bunch of Republicans trying to appeal to these mythical moderates and liberals who are getting all over Bush on Katrina and the Republicans don't want to be anywhere near Bush on Katrina, so they're trying to distance themselves from Bush by saying, "We'll take money away from the war because we know you hate the war, and you don't believe in it, and we'll give it to Katrina relief," 1.9 billion, chump change, a symbolic effort. But the idea that we can't do both in this country with the amount of money we've already committed to spend on Hurricane Katrina is just outrageous. What you need to do is really understand that it's an election year, and there's going to be far more of this; far more of this inexplicable stuff that will make total sense when you put it in the spectrum and the context of it being a political year.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Mark, Bethesda, Maryland. Welcome, sir. Nice to have you with us.

CALLER: Rush, good afternoon from the People's Republic of Bethesda, Maryland.

RUSH: Yes.

CALLER: The reason I was calling is about this national anthem thing in Spanish. Doesn't sit too well with me. These people are coming to this country and they've already aggravated enough people by what's going to happen on Monday with this whatever it's called, May Day thing, and I already heard some chicken plants, I think either here or in Arkansas, are going to be shutting down for the day.

RUSH: Yeah.

CALLER: And now, I only wonder, what would Theodore Roosevelt have said, and I've heard the quote and read the quote over and over, it seems like they don't want to become Americans. I would not have a problem however, I'm not saying to them give up their culture if they wanted to play first the American national anthem in English and if they wanted to play the Mexican national anthem, that's fine. That's still part of their culture.

RUSH: Yeah. Well, you hit the nail on the head here with something, Mark, and it's this. Immigration has always been a specific thing, and there's a formula, and it is this. People come here from far-away lands for whatever reasons, to seek a better life. In seeking a better life, they seek to become Americans, which means assimilating and acculturating into the great American culture. They have not come here just for jobs, to send the money home. They have come here to become Americans. The problem here is that, as these protests indicate, and as the Star-Spangled Banner indicates in Spanish and there's a number of other indications that are obvious, this aspect, this wave of illegal immigrants do not really indicate they want to become Americans. They don't want to be immigrants; they want to be legal so they can get jobs. The country is just a job market to them. It's a big distinction, because without the acculturation and the assimilation, we're just going to end up Balkanizing the society. And when they choose May 1, Soviet May Day, to go out and protest and basically shout and get in our faces and then purposely try to cause a backlash and demand to be exempted from our laws, this is not immigration that's going on here. I think we do this a disservice by referring to it as an immigration issue. It's not that.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...
(Reuters: May 1 immigrant boycott aims to "close" US cities)
(CBS: State Senate Supports Immigrant Walkout On Monday)
(AP: Spanish 'Star-Spangled Banner' Draws Ire)
Related:
Rush Limbaugh.com ** Immigration & the Free Market

Rush Limbaugh.com ** Illegals & Democrats In Your Face Again

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 3:21 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 29 April 2006 4:08 AM EDT
White House press corps demands to watch CNN instead of Fox News on Air Force One
Mood:  spacey
Now Playing: LIBTARD MEDIA BULLSHIT ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

White House scribe asks for the remote

Reporter asks to watch CNN on Air Force One

WASHINGTON -- It wasn't the price of gasoline, Darfur or the rebuilding effort in New Orleans that preoccupied the White House press corps Thursday aboard a flight on Air Force One.

It was what channel they could watch on the White House televisions, Fox or CNN.

During a briefing led by White House spokesman Scott McClellan as President Bush was traveling to New Orleans, Louisiana, the Washington Post's Jim VandeHei asked why the White House televisions always seemed to be tuned to Fox News and if it was possible to have them tuned instead to CNN.

"It's come to my attention that there's been requests -- this is a serious question -- to turn these TVs onto a station other than Fox, and that those have been denied," VandeHei told McClellan, who is soon to be replaced by former Fox anchor and self-described conservative Tony Snow.


"My question would be, is there a White House policy that all government TVs have to be tuned to Fox?" VandeHei asked.

"Never heard of any such thing," McClellan responded. "My TVs are on four different channels at all times."

VandeHei noted that McClellan has four televisions in his office, and clarified that he was referring to the ones that reporters can see.

"They're always turned to Fox, which a lot of people consider a Republican-leaning network."

VandeHei noted that the televisions are paid for with taxpayer dollars.

"And my understanding is that you guys have to watch Fox on Air Force One. Is that true?"

McClellan said it was the first he had heard such a claim, and that it was not true.

"In fact, I've watched other channels on here," he said.

"I've never known anyone that's raised a complaint about a request from back here to watch a different channel," McClellan added.

VandeHei replied, "I'm officially raising it, and officially complaining about it."

McClellan then asked whether VandeHei had tried to have the change made.

"I was told -- the quote was, 'No,' when I asked for CNN," the reporter said.

McClellan asked him with whom he had spoken, but VandeHei said he did not know.

"Well, the magic people at the other end of the phone ... I was told, 'We don't watch CNN here, you can only watch Fox,'" VandeHei said.

McClellan said he found the question "quite amusing," and left to see about making the change.

Eighteen minutes after VandeHei raised the issue, McClellan had resolved it.

"We just called up. They're going to be changing it, at your all's request, to the channel that you requested, which is CNN -- from the press corps."

Fox News is popular with at least one highly placed person in the White House. According to the Web site "The Smoking Gun," whenever Vice President Dick Cheney stays in a hotel room, he requests extra lights, copies of five newspapers and the television tuned to Fox. (Full story)

CNN.com ** White House scribe asks for the remote

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 2:07 AM EDT
Updated: Saturday, 29 April 2006 2:15 AM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older