« April 2006 »
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30


Kick Assiest Blog
Tuesday, 25 April 2006
Canadians give low marks to Health Care system
Mood:  d'oh
Now Playing: SOCIALIST UTOPIA ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Canadians give low marks to system

Only U.S. ranks worse in study
Patients surveyed for perceptions

Canadians rate their health care system lower than do people in five other developed countries, according to a new study.

But Americans, despite spending far more per capita on health, rate their health care system far worse than all the others, according to the study by the New York-based Commonwealth Fund.

The private foundation, which works to improve health care, released the study last week. It was based on adult patient surveys in 2004 and 2005 in Canada, the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and Germany.

Patients ranked six measures and 51 indicators of quality: patient safety, effectiveness, patient centredness, timeliness, efficiency and equity.

Canadians ranked the timeliness of their health care lower than any other nationality surveyed, with more than a third of 1,400 surveyed saying they had to wait longer than six days for a medical appointment and 42 per cent waiting more than two hours to be seen in an emergency room. More than half of Canadians said they had to wait longer than four weeks to see a specialist and a third had to wait four months or more for elective surgery.

Rates of lab errors were also high in Canada, which tied with the U.S. for the number of patients who said they experienced a medical mistake in their treatment in the past two years.

"For all countries, responses indicate room for improvement," the report says.

A second survey of sicker adults, looking at health care by income in four of the countries, found Canadians with above-average incomes have to wait just as long as poorer patients and have the same difficulty getting care at night and on weekends and holidays without going to a hospital emergency room.

"Rates of ER use were highest in Canada and the U.S. - the two countries with the longest waits to see physicians and where individuals had the most difficulties getting after-hour care," the report says.

Canada also had the worst scores on test results. More respondents than in any other country said they didn't get test results back or didn't have them explained properly.

The U.S., the only country surveyed that doesn't have a public health insurance system, ranked last on providing health care to low-income adults, scoring the worst on 16 of 30 measures studied.

"Overall, the report finds a health care divide separating the U.S. from the other four countries," the report says. "The U.S. stands out for pervasive disparities by income."

The U.S. spends $5,635 per capita on health, more than double the average among industrialized nations. Canada spends $3,003 per capita, the second highest of the countries surveyed, but only a few dollars separated it from Australia and Germany.

Health policy analyst Michael Rachlis cautioned that the report's results are based on patient self-reporting and the answers "could mean different things in different countries.

"This is an index....Put it all together and you're getting an overall grade," he said in an interview. "It doesn't necessarily mean we have the fifth-best health care system. But the main point is, you can say absolutely conclusively that the U.S. has the worst health care system in the world, and they're spending by far the most. The other major conclusion, which is probably way more important, is that every country could improve dramatically."

The Toronto Star ~ Elaine Carey ** Canadians give low marks to system

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 12:01 AM EDT
CIA Traitor Mary McCarthy's Political (D)onations
Mood:  chatty
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

MCCARTHY'S POLITICAL DONATIONS

I substantially agree with Jonah's point that the extraordinary amount of money at issue here is relevant but not dispositive when it comes to divining Mary McCarthy's motives. But I do think it's highly relevant - not just another fact in a firmament of facts.

That's because McCarthy's situation cannot be considered in a vacuum. Even with McCarthy considered alone, we are not talking about a single leak - the reporting indicates that she may be a serial leaker, the black-sites story being only the most prominent instance. But the broader context here is an intelligence community that was, quite brazenly, leaking in a manner designed to topple a sitting president. A big question here -- maybe not for purposes of guilt under the espionage act, but for the more important policy issue of a politicized CIA -- is whether she was part of a campaign that was grossly inappropriate for the intelligence community to engage in.

Remember Michael Scheuer, aka "Anonymous." It is simply dumbfounding that, as an intelligence officer heading up the bin Laden team (i.e., the unit targeting the number one, active national security problem facing the country) he was permitted by the CIA to write books about what he was doing. He has indicated, though, that it was fine with the agency as long as he was slamming the Bush administration.

Valerie Plame Wilson thought the whole Bush administration notion that Saddam was trying to arm up with nukes was crazy. She maneuvered to have, not an objective analyst, but her husband - with no WMD expertise but an enemy of the president's policy - sent to Niger, whence he returned and wrote a highly partisan, misleading and damaging op-ed in the NY Times about the Bush administration's case for toppling Saddam ... which op-ed he was permitted by the self-same CIA to write notwithstanding that his trip was (and should have been) classified.


All the while, there has been a steady drumbeat from the former intelligence officers - who anonymously fill Seymour Hersh books when they are not venting their spleens on the record - attacking every aspect of the administration's handling of the war on terror.

This has all been steady since 9/11. But it was especially frenetic in the run-up to the 2004 election (and the flavor of it ran throughout the 9/11 Commission hearings and, to a somewhat more muted extent, in the Commission's final report). The transparent purpose of it was to get Senator Kerry elected.

Now we find that an intelligence officer who was leaking information very damaging to Bush was a Kerry backer to a degree that was extraordinary for a single person on a government salary, and, even more extraordinarily, gave $5K of her own money to Democrats in the key swing state (Ohio) that, in the end, did actually decide the election.

From where I sit, that's pretty damn relevant.
National Review Online ~ The Corner - Andy McCarthy **
McCarthy's Political Donations

MCCARTHY TWIST
Here's the full Washington Post take-out on McCarthy's denial that she leaked the actual prison story.

Origional stories:
Sandy Burglar appointed CIA traitor McCarthy who was fired for leaking classified info to media

UPDATE: CIA traitor Mary McCarthy; Kerry supporter, appointed by Sandy Berger, Failed polygraph, admitted leaking

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 12:01 AM EDT
Updated: Wednesday, 26 April 2006 1:35 PM EDT
Monday, 24 April 2006
Penn State University censors exhibit, anti-terrorism art doesn't promote diversity
Mood:  spacey
Now Playing: LIBTARD ''TOLERANT, FREE SPEECH CHAMP, TOUGH ON TERROR, PATRIOTIC'' EDUCATION ALERT
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Of course if the exhibit had been Pro-Terrorist and Anti-semetic there wouldn't have been a problem...

Josh Stulman examines his artwork, previously scheduled for an art exhibit that was canceled by Penn State. The painting to the right, by Stulman, is titled "Our Greatest Hero" and depicts Hag Amin Al-Husseini, who was hailed as the greatest Palestinian hero by Yasir Arafat. Other works by Stulman address terrorism toward Jews. >>>>>

PSU censors exhibit
By Jessica Remitz

For Penn State student Josh Stulman, years of hard work ended in disappointment yesterday when the university cancelled his upcoming art exhibit for violation of Penn State's policies on nondiscrimination, harassment and hate.

Three days before his 10-piece exhibit -- Portraits of Terror -- was scheduled to open at the Patterson Building, Stulman (senior-painting and anthropology) received an e-mail message from the School of Visual Arts that said his exhibit on images of terrorism "did not promote cultural diversity" or "opportunities for democratic dialogue" and the display would be cancelled.

The exhibit, Stulman said, which is based mainly on the conflict in Palestinian territories, raises questions concerning the destruction of Jewish religious shrines, anti-Semitic propaganda and cartoons in Palestinian newspapers, the disregard for rules of engagement and treatment of prisoners, and the indoctrination of youth into terrorist acts.

"I'm being censored and the reason for censoring me doesn't make sense," Stulman said.

Charles Garoian, professor and director of the School of Visual Arts, said Stulman's controversial images did not mesh with the university's educational mission.

The decision to cancel the exhibit came after reviewing Penn State's Policy AD42: Statement on Nondiscrimination and Harassment and Penn State's Zero Tolerance Policy for Hate, he wrote.

Garoian could not be reached by The Daily Collegian for further comment by press time yesterday.

Penn State spokesman Bill Mahon wrote in an e-mail message that "there are other issues involved in the display that has caused a problem, issues that have nothing to do with the content of the painting." Mahon wrote that he did not know all the details.

"We always encourage those who are offended by free speech to use their own constitutional right to free speech to make their concerns known," Mahon wrote. "This is an educational institution and people should embrace opportunities to inform one another and the public. ... We don't have a right to hide art."

Stulman said the exhibit, which is sponsored by Penn State Hillel, aims to create awareness on campus about the senselessness of terrorism and drew inspiration from images that have appeared in the public through newspapers and television.

He said he was shocked at the university's decision to cancel the exhibit and that he has tried to meet with Garoian on numerous occasions to discuss his artwork.

"It's not about hate. I don't hate Muslims. This is not about Islam," Stulman said. "This is about terrorism impacting the Palestinian way of life and Israel way of life."

Stulman said advertisements for the event were defaced in the Patterson and School of Visual Arts buildings, one of which had a large swastika on it.

Stulman, who is Jewish, said he felt threatened and abused by the Nazi symbol and is concerned for his artwork and his personal well-being.

Garoian also wrote that exhibit space in the School of Visual Arts is reserved for students and faculty, not groups with a particular agenda.

Stulman said he created his paintings on his own and he approached Penn State Hillel in February to help with advertising costs and food for the opening. He said the School of Visual Arts did not object to his earlier exhibit, also sponsored by Hillel.

Tuvia Abramson, director of Penn State Hillel, said while Hillel sponsored the Stulman's exhibit, the group had nothing to do with his message or content.

"We don't have a political agenda except to support the voice of Jewish students," he said.

Abramson said Hillel is exploring other venues for Stulman's exhibits to ensure his message does not go unnoticed.

"It's about opening eyes and challenging viewpoints," Abramson said. "Artistic expression is the basis for creativity -- but here, it was blocked."

Collegian staff writers Meaghan Haugh and Devon Lash contributed to this article. - The Digital Collegian ~ Jessica Remitz ** PSU censors exhibit

This PC-loving bullshit slippery slope will lead to the end of our great nation.
Since when is showing facts about terrorism deemed hateful???
I really hope we as a nation wake up and stop this nonsense. Illegal immigrants with more rights then legal, law-abiding citizens, and handling terrorists with kid gloves is absolutely insane.

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 4:46 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 24 April 2006 4:56 PM EDT
Department of Pointless Polling: Lurch Heinz Kerry Would Defeat Bush in New US Election
Mood:  silly
Topic: Funny Stuff


Should we tell the "intellectual, smarter than everybody else" libtards that Bush can't run in '08? I don't think they know that!
By the way... didn't all the polls say that Lurch would win in 2004? And what will the Demented-crats do without their boogie man come November 2008?


Kerry Would Defeat Bush in New U.S. Election

The outcome of the 2004 United States presidential election would be different if a new ballot took place this year, according to a poll by Bloomberg and the Los Angeles Times. 47 percent of respondents would vote for Democrat John Kerry, while 40 percent would support Republican George W. Bush.

In American elections, candidates require 270 votes in the U.S. Electoral College to win the White House. In November 2004, Bush earned a second term after securing 286 electoral votes from 31 states. Kerry received 252 electoral votes from 19 states and the District of Columbia. As far as the popular vote is concerned, Bush garnered 51.03 percent of all cast ballots, with Kerry getting 48.04 percent.

In a January 2005 interview with NBC's Tim Russert, Kerry expressed satisfaction with his campaign, saying, "I won the youth vote. I won the independent vote. I won the moderate vote. If you take half the people at an Ohio State football game on Saturday afternoon and they were to have voted the other way, you and I would be having a discussion today about my State of the Union speech."

On Apr. 20, Kerry discussed the possibility of a presidential bid in 2008, saying, "I will make that decision before the end of the year but I'm thinking about it hard." The Massachusetts senator jokingly added, "If you can help me find 60,000 votes in Ohio."

Bush is ineligible for a third term in office. The next presidential election is scheduled for November 2008.

Polling Data
Regardless of how you may have voted in the presidential election in November 2004, knowing what you know today, would you vote for George W. Bush or John Kerry if the presidential election was being held today?

John Kerry (D) 47%

George W. Bush (R) 40%

Someone else 6%

Would not vote 4%

Don't know 3%

Source: Bloomberg / Los Angeles Times
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,357 American adults, conducted from Apr. 8 to Apr. 11, 2006. Margin of error is 3 percent.

Angus Reid Global Scan ~ Polls & Research - Bloomberg / LATimes ** Kerry Would Defeat Bush in New U.S. Election


Of course.. what is being gnored here is that an election would not be held without a campaign...

Well, there's 13% of undecideds in that poll, so since this would ostensibly be an election, those 13% couldn't vote undecided, so the poll is useless - like every other poll since Novemeber 2004 and until November 2008.
This is just another meaningless story that the mainstream libtard media can trumpet instead of the story about the CIA agent who was fired for leaking classified information to the press.


I guess the next poll will state that "Clinton would have killed Bin Laden if he had made the decision today."

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 4:14 PM EDT
Updated: Monday, 24 April 2006 4:20 PM EDT
Staff sergeant's suspicion of civilian led to evacuation of Iraq Internet cafe before blast, saved 17 lives
Mood:  a-ok
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff

You would only see this on the mainstream libtard media if there was a high tragic death toll...

Soldiers and workers at Al Kisik in Iraq examine damage caused a bomb attack on the camp's Internet caf? on March 27. Staff Sgt. Martin Richburg's quick thinking is credited for averting deaths and injuries. No one was hurt in the blast. >>>>>

Staff sergeant's suspicion of civilian led to evacuation of Iraq Internet cafe before blast
By Monte Morin

AL KISIK, Iraq - The camp was still on edge from a suicide bomb attack that morning.

The bomber had targeted an Iraqi army recruiting drive at the combined Iraqi and American forces base here in northwest Iraq. Although no U.S. soldiers were injured, soldiers from the 2nd, or "Gunners," Battalion, 3rd Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Brigade, 1st Armored Division, out of Giessen, Germany, dealt with the aftermath.

"Imagine a dump truck filled with 40 bodies, some alive, some dead, some walking around with only a scratch," said 1st Lt. David "Big Doc" Brickhouse, the physician's assistant who oversaw the treatment and evacuation of victims. "It was crazy."

So it was with no small amount of suspicion that Staff Sgt. Martin Richburg (right) observed an Iraqi civilian pacing nervously near the camp's crowded Internet cafe that same evening.

It was around 9 p.m. on March 27, and Richburg was sitting behind the wheel of his "bongo" flatbed truck in the parking lot, talking to his wife on a cell phone.

"I saw this guy duckin' and peepin' outside the Internet [cafe]," said the 44-year-old Baltimore, native. "I said, 'Let me keep an eye on this guy.'"

Unknown to Richburg at the time, the man was an insurgent who had managed to get a job at the camp's Iraqi army noncommissioned officer academy. Part of a cell that had planned a series of attacks, the insurgent had constructed a bomb within the camp after smuggling components in piece by piece.

Richburg, a heavy-vehicle mechanic assigned to the 142nd Maintenance Company, grew increasingly suspicious as the man peered into the cafe window, walked away, and then returned with a plastic chair and a package.

"I'm really watching the guy at this point, I'm watching his every move," Richburg said. "I'm sitting right there and the guy never even saw me."

The package looked like something bulky wrapped in a blue plastic shopping bag. Richburg's suspicion grew to alarm when the man stepped onto the chair, placed the bag on top of the window's air conditioning unit and then took off running.

Throwing down his cell phone - his wife was still on the line - Richburg dashed after the man and brought him down with a swift kick to the back of his legs. By this time, Richburg had drawn his 9 mm pistol and, holding the man down, called for another Iraqi he knew to translate.

"I asked him if he knew who this guy was and he said, 'No,'" Richburg said. "I told him I saw him put a package on the air conditioner and asked him to find out what was in it. Then I charged my weapon to scare him."

The man answered back quickly. He said he had placed a bomb on the air conditioner. Richburg asked how much time they had before it exploded. "Five minutes," the man said.

Dragging the insurgent in one hand and waving his pistol in the other, the burly mechanic rushed to the cafe entrance and began shouting at everyone to get out.

Shocked by the sight of Richburg waving a pistol and swearing at the top of his lungs, a dozen soldiers and five civilians piled out of the cafe. The mechanic yelled at them to take cover behind a line of concrete blast barriers.

The soldiers braced themselves. After roughly 15 minutes, the package exploded with the noise of an artillery shell. The windshield of Richburg's truck "crystallized" by the blast, and a Porta-John was flung into a nearby meadow. The window of the Internet cafe was destroyed, driving glass and shrapnel deep into the walls and computer booths.

Since the cafe had been cleared, nobody was injured.

"The bomb definitely would have killed some people," said Maj. John Stark, a liaison officer to the Iraqi army. "It definitely would have killed the guy sitting next to the air conditioner."

Richburg has since been awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device for valor, and has been nominated for a Bronze Star for his actions on that evening.

"I suppose anyone else would have done it too," Richburg said of his actions. "It was the way the guy moved. If he walked away normally I might not have done it."

Stars and Stripes ~ Monte Morin ** Staff sergeant's suspicion of civilian led to evacuation of Iraq Internet cafe before blast

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 1:11 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 24 April 2006 1:17 AM EDT
TV station catches gaffe by Cynthia McKinney
Mood:  d'oh
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

TV station catches gaffe by McKinney

Congresswoman berates staffer as tape rolled after interview
By Bridget Gutierrez

Move over Britney Spears, Cynthia McKinney's - oops! - done it again.

The flap-plagued congresswoman, who has been in the media spotlight since she scuffled with a Capitol Hill police officer last month, was caught bad-mouthing a senior staffer Saturday.

Unfortunately for McKinney, a DeKalb County Democrat who is running for re-election in the 4th Congressional District, a TV microphone she was wearing picked up her indelicate grumbling.

"Crap!" an irritated McKinney is heard saying after ending an interview with CBS 46 in which reporter Renee Starzyk repeatedly asked about the fallout from the police dust-up. "You know what? They lied to Coz and Coz is a fool."

McKinney, apparently realizing her blunder, then returned to face the camera and tell the reporter that comments about her communications director, Coz Carson, were off the record.

But the TV stationed aired the footage Saturday and the story later was picked up by CNN.

Mike Machi, Channel 46's assistant news director, said McKinney's office was aware Starzyk would ask about the fuss in the one-on-one interview.

"Congresswoman McKinney has been in Washington for a long time and she has handled the media for most of her public life," said Machi, who was unapologetic about airing the interview outtakes. "There were lots of ways to handle this and I was absolutely surprised that she handled this situation in that fashion."

McKinney, who is expected to qualify for her U.S. House race today, could not be reached Sunday for comment. But Carson, who said he began working for the congresswoman a week before the pushing incident, seemed unbothered by the public upbraiding.

"I share her frustration with the media's insatiable appetite for controversy and unimportant issues," said Carson, a former newsman who said he has known McKinney and her family for years.

Carson said he was present for Saturday's interview, which took place during a community meeting with constituents, but declined to say what led to the rebuke.

He also demurred when asked if he had spoken to McKinney about the "fool" comment.

"I'll just say I look forward to getting back to work tomorrow," he said.

Political observer Merle Black of Emory University got a chuckle out of McKinney's latest gaffe. But he said he wasn't surprised by her behavior, even in an election year.

"All of this is consistent," Black said of the way McKinney has handled the attention, including her charges that the police incident was racially motivated. "She doesn't act the way most Congress members act."

Atlanta Journal-Constitution ~ Bridget Gutierrez **
TV station catches gaffe by McKinney

Also at: Sweetness & Light ** McKinney Strikes Again

View the video at: Expose the Left ** "Off The Record": McKinney Calls Aide A "Fool" (VIDEO)

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 12:01 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, 24 April 2006 12:19 AM EDT
Sunday, 23 April 2006
Islamist protest in NY: 'Mushroom cloud on way'
Mood:  don't ask
Now Playing: GLOBAL JIHAD
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff


Islamist protest in N.Y. - 'Mushroom cloud on way'

Rally at Israeli consulate features pictures of Muslim flags flying over White House

A New York rally by the Islamic Thinkers Society outside the Israeli consulate yesterday featured chants of "The mushroom cloud is on its way! The real holocaust is on its way!"

The demonstration by the Queens-based group was monitored by the Investigative Project on Terrorism whose members noted signs including "Islam will Dominate" and a picture with an Islamic flag flying over the White House.

The chants were in Arabic and translated by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, headed by Steve Emerson, a former reporter for CNN.

Here are some excerpts from the chants:

Leader (in Arabic): "With our blood and our lives we will liberate al Aqsa!"

[The rest also respond in Arabic:] "With our blood and our lives we will liberate al Aqsa!

Israeli Zionists What do you say? The real Holocaust is on its way"

"Takbeer!"

Response: "Allahu Akbar!"

"Takbeer!"

Response: "Allahu Akbar!"

"Zionists, Zionists You will pay! The Wrath of Allah is on its way!

Israeli Zionists You shall pay! The Wrath of Allah is on its way!

The mushroom cloud is on its way! The real Holocaust is on its way!"

"Israel won't last long ... Indeed, Allah will repeat the Holocaust right on the soil of Israel"

"Takbeer!"

Response: "Allahu Akbar!"

According to the Investigative Project on Terrorism, the Islamic Thinkers Society is an offshoot of London's Al-Muhajiroun, a group that celebrated the 9/11 attacks, referring to the hijackers as "the Magnificent 19," and posting a burning picture of the Capitol on its website.

Related offers: 'Everlasting Hatred: The Roots of Jihad': 9-11 dates back 4,000 years

The Life and Religion of Mohammed: Learn the ugly truth about the founder of the world's most violent religion

'Islamic Imperialism': 'Root cause' of Muslim war on the West - the religion itself

Related stories:
Jailed American link to London bombing?
Flag desecrators issue threat
Al-Qaida suspect tied to U.S.-UK jihad group
Islamic leader hails Chechen attacks
Bogus 'rape' photos used in call for jihad
British jihadist depicts U.S. Capitol in flames
Group celebrates 'Magnificent 19' hijackers
British Muslims moving into Mideast terror
Muslim leaders pledge to 'transform West'
Islamist terror still promoted on Web
IslamicTerror.com?

World Net Daily ** Islamist protest in N.Y. - 'Mushroom cloud on way'

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 11:35 PM EDT
Updated: Sunday, 23 April 2006 11:48 PM EDT
Army Interpreter Answers Cell Phone, Dupes Insurgents, And the terrorist keeps calling back
Mood:  cheeky
Topic: Yahoo Chat Stuff

Sgt. Nicholas Hake-Jordan, 23, of 1st Battalion, 68th Armor, from Springfield, Ore., holds a new sniper rifle seized during a patrol that also yielded one dead insurgent thanks to a sly interpreter. >>>>>

Wrong number: Interpreter answers cell phone, dupes insurgents
By Jeff Schogol

IBRAHIM AL MARKHUR, Iraq - One misplaced cell phone and one savvy interpreter equaled one dead insurgent, several pieces of intelligence and a whole lot of captured weapons.

On a routine patrol, U.S. troops with 1st Battalion, 68th Armor came upon a house in the midst of dense greenery and at the end of a dusty country road.

Staff Sgt. Matthew Nicodemus, 33, said he immediately noticed that no Iraqi men were around.

Suddenly, a cell phone inside the home rang, said Nicodemus, of Altoona, Pa.

"The interpreter went in and answered the phone, and on the other end of the phone the person said, in Arabic, 'Hey, coalition forces are here, go ahead and run away,' and he specifically said, 'Go and run into the palm groves all around here,'" Nicodemus said.

The troops then fanned out into the palm groves and found several weapons including several rocket-propelled grenades and hand grenades, two AK-47s and a new sniper's rifle, Nicodemus said.

They also found a hand-written map of a U.S. military base, diagrams on how to build rockets and a CD-ROM with several thousand files written in Arabic, said Sgt. 1st Class Michael Greer, 35, of San Luis Obispo, Calif.

If that weren't enough, the insurgent kept calling the interpreter back to ask what the Americans were doing.

The interpreter kept the act going.

"He's basically acting like, you know, he's watching us ... making sure everything is fine," Nicodemus said.

The U.S. troops knew the insurgents were coming back and decided to lie in wait for them.

Many troops said they were psyched by the prospect of killing the person on the other end of the phone.

"I love this [expletive]," said Sgt. Nicholas Hake-Jordan, 23, of Springfield, Ore.

The troops didn't have to wait long.

Shortly after U.S. troops set up, the insurgents called the interpreter and said they would be by in about 10 minutes to attack the Americans, said Staff Sgt. Art Hoffman, 30.

When seven insurgents got to the house,
they ran into a wall of U.S. fire, said Hoffman, of Baltimore.

"The first guy that came in the door just dropped like a rock. The other two guys behind him got hit pretty hard, too. The rest grabbed their wounded and just ran back off," said Hoffman.

One insurgent was confirmed killed in the fighting and the other two were in bad shape, he said.

Afterward, the battalion commander, Lt. Col. Thomas Fisher, 42, praised his soldiers' actions.

"The initiative demonstrated at the platoon level is exactly how you win this fight," said Fisher, of Sioux Falls, S.D.

Stars and Stripes ~ Jeff Schogol **
Wrong number: Interpreter answers cell phone, dupes insurgents

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 10:53 PM EDT
Updated: Sunday, 23 April 2006 11:10 PM EDT
Dana Priest's Husband Gets Joe Wilson Gigs
Mood:  don't ask
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Dana Priest's Husband Gets Joe Wilson Gigs

Pulitzer Prize winning Dana Priest is married to William Goodfellow. William Goodfellow is the Executive Director of the the Center for International Policy (CIP).

Here is what Discover The Networks has to say about the Center For International Policy:


America's Red Army

One of the most sophisticated of Fenton's anti-war projects is the co-mingling of Win Without War and the Center for International Policy (CIP).

Before 9/11, CIP, a Fenton Communications client, mainly acted as Fidel Castro's greatest "think tank" ally. Much of its million-dollar budget was spent lobbying to end economic sanctions and travel restrictions against Cuba.

Now, it has another mission. Fenton has established a "war room" with CIP called The Iraq Policy Information Program (IPIP). Its main job is getting the anti-Bush foreign policy message out to the media and providing guests for talk shows. A featured speaker of the IPIP is former ambassador Joe Wilson, one of the Bush administration's most vocal enemies.

Like Moveon.org and Win Without War, the contact for the Iraq Policy Information Program is Fenton Communications. Win Without War also collects tax-deductible donations through CIP.

So Dana Priest's husband runs an operation that gets Joe Wilson speaking gigs.

Don't you just love our one party media?

(Mucho gracias to Lucianne Goldberg for the Priest-Goodfellow-CIP connection.)

Update!

More news on this from the inimitable Lucianne.

Dana Priest and Mel Goodman shared a stage behind the CIP banner in October 2003. From the first page of their news letter (warning, pdf file):


Indeed, Dana Priest shared the stage that day with none other than the notorious liar, Joe Wilson. From page five of the same CIP newsletter:


By the way, Mel Goodman is a member of (crackpot) Larry Johnson's Johnson’s Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), which is an organization that pleads with former and current CIA officers to break their oaths and leak secrets that would hurt our national security.

From the DNC's Associated Press:

Ex-CIA Accuse Bush of Manipulating Iraq Evidence
Monday, March 17, 2003

WASHINGTON - Invoking the name of a Pentagon whistle-blower, a small group of retired, anti-war CIA officers are accusing the Bush administration of manipulating evidence against Iraq in order to push war while burying evidence that could show Iraq's compliance with U.N demands for disarmament.

The 25-member group, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity, composed mostly of former CIA analysts along with a few operational agents, is urging employees inside the intelligence agency to break the law and leak any information they have that could show the Bush administration is engineering the release of evidence to match its penchant for war...

What a coincidence, huh?

More on Mel Goodman, from Wikipedia:

9/11 conspiracy theories

US Representative Cynthia McKinney led a Capitol Hill hearing on July 23, 2005 into "what warnings the Bush administration received before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001."

Panelist and former CIA official Melvin Goodman was quoted as saying "Congresswoman McKinney is viewed as a contrarian and I hope someday her views will be considered conventional wisdom."

Many 9/11 researchers testified at the hearing, including Michael Ruppert, Peter Dale Scott, Wayne Madsen and several others.

That is to say, Goodman hopes it becomes conventional wisdom that Bush knew 9/11 was going to happen - and he let it happen. Even encouraged it to happen.

These are the thoughts of Dana Priest's friends and colleagues. Her brethren.

Related Articles: Fired CIA Leaker Gave $10K Kerry And Dems
CIA Accuser's Story Is A Year Old
CIA Fires Leaker Of "European Prisons" Tale
White House Goes After Treasonous Leakers
W-Post Leaks More National Security Secrets
W-Post Closes Own Blog To Block Anti-Dem Facts
More On 9/11 Expert Charlie Sheen

Sweetness & Light ** Dana Priest's Husband Gets Joe Wilson Gigs

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 10:09 PM EDT
Updated: Sunday, 23 April 2006 10:30 PM EDT
Earth Day Founder's Libtarded Daughter Says Gas Prices Not Too High
Mood:  spacey
Topic: Lib Loser Stories

Earth Day Founder's Daughter Says Gas Prices Not Too High

MADSION, Wis. -- The daughter of the founder of Earth Day says she doesn't think gasoline prices are too high.

Tia Nelson, the daughter of former U.S. Sen. Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin, said "we pay less for a gallon of gas than anywhere else in the world. And if we paid what the Europeans paid we'd wouldn't be driving vehicles that got 12 miles a gallon."

She said that if there's a silver lining in the higher gas prices, it's that people are driving less and companies are being forced to think about being more efficient.

Saturday is the 37th annual observance of Earth Day -- the first without Gaylord Nelson, who died last July.

Tia Nelson said it's a bittersweet day for her family but added that they are grateful his legacy lives on.

NBC 4 News Detroit ~ Associated Press ** Earth Day Founder's Daughter Says Gas Prices Not Too High

Posted by yaahoo_2006iest at 8:40 PM EDT

Newer | Latest | Older